Sun's fickle heart may leave us cold 25 January 2007 From New Scientist Print Edition. Stuart Clark 1 There's a dimmer switch inside the sun that causes its brightness to rise and fall on timescales of around 100,000 years - exactly the same period as between ice ages on Earth. So says a physicist who has created a computer model of our star's core. 2 Robert Ehrlich of George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, modelled the effect of temperature fluctuations in the sun's interior. According to the standard view, the temperature of the sun's core is held constant by the opposing pressures of gravity and nuclear fusion. However, Ehrlich believed that slight variations should be possible. 3 He took as his starting point the work of Attila Grandpierre of the Konkoly Observatory of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In 2005, Grandpierre and a collaborator, Gábor Ágoston, calculated that magnetic fields in the sun's core could produce small instabilities in the solar plasma. These instabilities would induce localised oscillations in temperature. 4 Ehrlich's model shows that whilst most of these oscillations cancel each other out, some reinforce one another and become long-lived temperature variations. The favoured frequencies allow the sun's core temperature to oscillate around its average temperature of 13.6 million kelvin in cycles lasting either 100,000 or 41,000 years. Ehrlich says that random interactions within the sun's magnetic field could flip the fluctuations from one cycle length to the other. 5 These two timescales are instantly recognisable to anyone familiar with Earth's ice ages: for the past million years, ice ages have occurred roughly every 100,000 years. Before that, they occurred roughly every 41,000 years. 6 Most scientists believe that the ice ages are the result of subtle changes in Earth's orbit, known as the Milankovitch cycles. One such cycle describes the way Earth's orbit gradually changes shape from a circle to a slight ellipse and back again roughly every 100,000 years. The theory says this alters the amount of solar radiation that Earth receives, triggering the ice ages. However, a persistent problem with this theory has been its inability to explain why the ice ages changed frequency a million years ago. 7 "In Milankovitch, there is certainly no good idea why the frequency should change from one to another," says Neil Edwards, a climatologist at the Open University in Milton Keynes, UK. Nor is the transition problem the only one the Milankovitch theory faces. Ehrlich and other critics claim that the temperature variations caused by Milankovitch cycles are simply not big enough to drive ice ages. 8 However, Edwards believes the small changes in solar heating produced by Milankovitch cycles are then amplified by feedback mechanisms on Earth. For example, if sea ice begins to form because of a slight cooling, carbon dioxide that would otherwise have found its way into the atmosphere as part of the carbon cycle is locked into the ice. That weakens the greenhouse effect and Earth grows even colder. 9 According to Edwards, there is no lack of such mechanisms. "If you add their effects together, there is more than enough feedback to make Milankovitch work," he says. "The problem now is identifying which mechanisms are at work." This is why scientists like Edwards are not yet ready to give up on the current theory. "Milankovitch cycles give us ice ages roughly when we observe them to happen. We can calculate where we are in the cycle and compare it with observation," he says. "I can't see any way of testing [Ehrlich's] idea to see where we are in the temperature oscillation." 10 Ehrlich concedes this. "If there is a way to test this theory on the sun, I can't think of one that is practical," he says. That's because variation over 41,000 to 100,000 years is too gradual to be observed. However, there may be a way to test it in other stars: red dwarfs. Their cores are much smaller than that of the sun, and so Ehrlich believes that the oscillation periods could be short enough to be observed. He has yet to calculate the precise period or the extent of variation in brightness to be expected. 11 Nigel Weiss, a solar physicist at the University of Cambridge, is far from convinced. He describes Ehrlich's claims as "utterly implausible". Ehrlich counters that Weiss's opinion is based on the standard solar model, which fails to take into account the magnetic instabilities that cause the temperature fluctuations. Questions 1-4 Complete each of the following statements with One or Two names of the scientists from the box below. Write the appropriate letters A-E in boxes 1-4 on your answer sheet. A. Attila Grandpierre B. Gábor Ágoston C. Neil Edwards D. Nigel Weiss E. Robert Ehrlich 1. ...claims there抯 a dimmer switch inside the sun that causes its brightness to rise and fall in periods as long as those between ice ages on Earth. 2. ...calculated that the internal solar magnetic fields could produce instabilities in the solar plasma. 3. ...holds that Milankovitch cycles can induce changes in solar heating on Earth and the changes are amplified on Earth. 4. ...doesn't believe in Ehrlich's viewpoints at all. Questions 5-9 Do the following statements agree with the information given in the reading passage? In boxes 5-9 on your answer sheet write TRUE if the statement is true according to the passage FALSE if the statement is false according to the passage NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage 5. The ice ages changed frequency from 100,000 to 41,000 years a million years ago. 6. The sole problem that the Milankovitch theory can not solve is to explain why the ice age frequency should shift from one to another. 7. Carbon dioxide can be locked artificially into sea ice to eliminate the greenhouse effect. 8. Some scientists are not ready to give up the Milankovitch theory though they haven't figured out which mechanisms amplify the changes in solar heating. 9. Both Edwards and Ehrlich believe that there is no practical way to test when the solar temperature oscillation begins and when ends Questions 10-14 Complete the notes below. Choose one suitable word from the Reading Passage above for each answer. Write your answers in boxes 10-14 on your answer sheet. The standard view assumes that the opposing pressures of gravity and nuclear fusions hold the temperature ...10...in the sun's interior, but the slight changes in the earth's ...11... alter the temperature on the earth and cause ice ages every 100,000 years. A British scientist, however, challenges this view by claiming that the internal solar magnetic ...12... can induce the temperature oscillations in the sun's interior. The sun's core temperature oscillates around its average temperature in ...13... lasting either 100,000 or 41,000 years. And the ...14... interactions within the sun's magnetic field could flip the fluctuations from one cycle length to the other, which explains why the ice ages changed frequency a million years ago.
1. E See the sentences in paragraph 1(There's a dimmer switch inside the sun that causes its brightness to rise and fall on timescales of around 100,000 years - exactly the same period as between ice ages on Earth. So says a physicist who has created a computer model of our star's core.) and para.2 (Robert Ehrlich of George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, modelled the effect of temperature fluctuations in the sun's interior.) 2. A B See para.3: ?i style='mso-bidi-font-style: normal'>Grandpierre and a collaborator, Gábor Ágoston, calculated that magnetic fields in the sun's core could produce small instabilities in the solar plasma. 3. C See para.8: Edwards believes the small changes in solar heating produced by Milankovitch cycles are then amplified by feedback mechanisms on Earth. 4. D See para.11: Nigel Weiss, a solar physicist at the University of Cambridge, is far from convinced. He describes Ehrlich's claims as "utterly implausible". 5. False See para.5: for the past million years, ice ages have occurred roughly every 100,000 years. Before that, they occurred roughly every 41,000 years. 6. False See para.7: "In Milankovitch, there is certainly no good idea why the frequency should change from one to another," ... Nor is the transition problem the only one the Milankovitch theory faces. 7. Not Given See para.8: if sea ice begins to form because of a slight cooling, carbon dioxide?is locked into the ice. That weakens the greenhouse effect. (The passage doesn抰 mention anything about locking Co2 into ice artificially.) 8. True See para.9: there is no lack of such mechanisms. "If you add their effects together, there is more than enough feedback to make Milankovitch work,"?"The problem now is identifying which mechanisms are at work." This is why scientists like Edwards are not yet ready to give up on the current theory. 9. True See the sentences in para.9 (According to Edwards, 卙e says. "I can't see any way of testing [Ehrlich's] idea to see where we are in the temperature oscillation.") and para.10 (Ehrlich concedes this. "If there is a way to test this theory on the sun, I can't think of one that is practical). 10. constant See para.2: According to the standard view, the temperature of the sun's core is held constant by the opposing pressures of gravity and nuclear fusion. 11. orbit See para.6: Most scientists believe that the ice ages are the result of subtle changes in Earth's orbit, 匛arth's orbit gradually changes shape from a circle to a slight ellipse and back again roughly every 100,000 years. 12. instabilities See para.3: ?i style='mso-bidi-font-style:normal'>magnetic fields in the sun's core could produce small instabilities in the solar plasma. These instabilities would induce localised oscillations in temperature. 13. cycles See para.4: …allow the sun's core temperature to oscillate around its average temperature of 13.6 million kelvin in cycles lasting either 100,000 or 41,000 years. 14. random See para.4: Ehrlich says that random interactions within the sun's magnetic field could flip the fluctuations from one cycle length to the other |
雅思考試論壇熱貼: |
【責任編輯:蘇婧 糾錯】 |
|
閱讀上一篇:2009雅思閱讀實戰訓練(七) |
|
閱讀下一篇:2009雅思閱讀實戰訓練(四) |
|
【育路網版權與免責聲明】 | |
① 凡本網注明稿件來源為"原創"的所有文字、圖片和音視頻稿件,版權均屬本網所有。任何媒體、網站或個人轉載、鏈接、轉貼或以其他方式復制發表時必須注明"稿件來源:育路網",違者本網將依法追究責任; | |
② 本網部分稿件來源于網絡,任何單位或個人認為育路網發布的內容可能涉嫌侵犯其合法權益,應該及時向育路網書面反饋,并提供身份證明、權屬證明及詳細侵權情況證明,育路網在收到上述法律文件后,將會盡快移除被控侵權內容。 |
視頻課程 |
·2010年雅思有48個考試日 比今年新增2個 |
·獲廣泛認可 中國雅思考生數量破歷史紀錄 |
·美領館解答最新留學簽證政策 |
·2010年雅思考試時間表及開考城市 |
·英國大使館:中國雅思成績逐年提高 |
·河北省首個雅思考點“落戶”石家莊 |
·權威盤點:出國語言考試之五大最 |
·最新資訊:雅思將暫不在中國推行機考 |
·外地考生來渝“搶”雅思托?嘉 |
·中國學生雅思考試:應用能力成軟肋 |
·北京新航道學校寒假課程最新優惠 |
·引領考雅熱潮,開啟雅思新紀元 |
·明年雅思增兩考試日 全年設48個考試日期 |
· 北京環球雅思學校雅思培訓 |
·雅思報名過程中重要問題的最新提示 |
·澳大利亞四大名校提高入學門檻 |
·新航道5周年真情大回饋! |
·南昌:IELTS考點成立并開放網上報名的通知 |
·美國:09年20所頂級名校錄取率盤點 |
·7月初ETS官方答疑解答公布 |
·雅思聽力考試的最大障礙:詞匯聽不懂 |
·從劍橋聽力看出題難點 |
·堅持不懈訓練雅思聽力方法 |
·雅思聽力備考關鍵:最后一堂課的“份量” |
·名師解析雅思聽力兩大誤區 |
·聽力考試中的數字考點 |
·10月24日雅思聽力考題回顧 |
·烤鴨必備 走近雅思聽力 |
·為什么聽力總是第二遍才能聽懂 |
·烤鴨,帶你走近雅思聽力! |
·雅思口語:如何克服中文思維 |
·應對雅思口語之各種食物的英文說法 |
·口語考試:小心你的肢體語言 |
·雅思口語Part 1中最難的10道題 |
·雅思口語Part 2中最難的10道題 |
·雅思口語Part 3中最難的10道題 |
·雅思口語素材:The Oriental Pearl TV Tower |
·雅思口語考試:不可忽略的細節 |
·名師教您如何從“聽”中提高雅思口語 |
·雅思口語中用于過渡的萬能猶豫句 |
·雅思閱讀考試圖形題目中必須掌握的英語單詞 |
·雅思閱讀考試:高中生需掌握四大技能 |
·突破雅思閱讀8分的捷徑 |
·雅思閱讀中的Matching分類和應對策略 |
·雅思?奸喿x文章背景知識:攝影術與藝術 |
·如何突破雅思閱讀高分“瓶頸” |
·雅思閱讀:需要會“找”會“挑” |
·雅思閱讀段落標題題的新趨勢及應對策略 |
·10月24日雅思閱讀考題回顧 |
·有關雅思閱讀Heading題的做題方法 |
·雅思寫作高分必讀:小作文句子模版總結 |
·寫作-考場上的"興奮劑"事件 |
·雅思寫作:中國學生常見問題 |
·雅思寫作TASK2三步走常見誤區 |
·雅思作文:多練才是王道 |
·雅思:專業運動員是否可以比其他職業賺得多 |
·10月24日雅思寫作(A類)考題回顧 |
·10月24日雅思寫作(G類)考題回顧 |
·2009年10月24日雅思寫作真題點評 |
·雅思寫作步驟指導:如何審題和列大綱 |