對外經貿大學2010考研復試經驗及復試試題(企管)

　很慶幸，被擬錄取了

　　想起復試，我有點后悔之前沒好好準備，復試的過程覺得回答的挺糟糕，還好有點小運氣`。以下我說的你們就知道為什么要重視復試了。

　　一、復試程序：

　　先統一抽簽復試的順序，共分四組同時進行。之后按簽的順序一一進入，單獨進行。大概有4位考官(緊張的沒來得及數人數了)，桌上有3個信封，內有不同的題目，類型都是一道英文題，兩道中文題。老師讓你隨便選一個信封。打開后英文的讓你讀一遍，然后回答老師的問題。中文的看一遍直接回答。面試結束在一教師等候消息，若告知可以走了，就不用二面，很大可能ok了!若要二面也不代表一定沒希望。

　　二、復試真題(我盡量回憶)

　　英文的題，我百度了下，還真有。如下：

　　A child learns such fundamental things as how to walk, talk, eat, dress, and so on without being taught these things. Adults learn most of what they use at work or at leisure while at work or leisure. Most of what is taught in classroom settings is forgotten, and much or what is remembered is irrelevant. In most schools, memorization is mistaken for learning. Most of what is remembered is remembered only for a short time, but then is quickly forgotten. (How many remember how to take a square root or ever have a need to?) Furthermore, even young children are aware of the fact that most of what is expected of them in school can better be done by computers, recording machines, cameras, and so on. They are treated as poor surrogates for such machines and instruments. Why should children -- or adults, for that matter -- be asked to do something computers and related equipment can do much better than they can? Why doesn't education focus on what humans can do better than the machines and instruments they create?

　　When those who have taught others are asked who in the classes learned most, virtually all of them say, "The teacher." It is apparent to those who have taught that teaching is a better way to learn than being taught. Teaching enables the teacher to discover what one thinks about the subject being taught. Schools are upside down: Students should be teaching and faculty learning.

　　題目下面貌似有三個問題，我一讀完老師就問“do you catch the main idea of this passage?”我回答了“yes”(我想總不能no吧)

　　完了老師馬上拋出問題，叫我再念一遍比較后一句話，然后問: “do you agree with it?” 一開始沒抓住準確意思，一直在yes和no之間徘徊。我想了很久比較后一句話的意思，至今仍迷糊。這件事教育下一代：多練練邊讀邊理解文章的意思，別靠臨時抱佛腳，英語非一日之功!

　　還有一問：what we should do to change it?(大概意思，原話不記得)回答的微觀點好，別扯上國家法律，老師都笑了。

　　中文題：有兩道，前面說的小運氣，就是我是小組比較后一個，老師為了盡快完成，只要我回答其中一個篇幅少的問題:薩繆爾森經濟學教科書每年的內容更新不大，而為什么經常要出版新的版本?(大致意思，原題比這豐富)我回答的不是很好，一個老師說我本科不是學經濟的(本科學的審計)，就放過我不再繼續追問了。

　　三、經驗教訓

　　1、千萬別相信貿大復試不刷人(雖然我在復試前也一直這么認為)誰說了貿大復試很好過的?!今年企管刷人了，具體數目我不知道，有9人進入二面了，比例還是相當大的

　　2、英語一定要多練，復試前可以經常拿文章念，并同時理解，等在復試桌上念的云里霧里時后悔就來不及了。

　　3、雖說是企管，看復試的題目，內容很寬泛，要多關注經濟等其他方面的東西，要靈活，知識面廣，問到啥都不怕了。老師看的應該是多方面素質和能力，包括思考、解決問題能力等等，只揪著一本書是學不來的，平常多注意自己思考些問題，多問為什么。

　　4、精神面貌(也就是給老師的整體感覺)很重要，請多點笑容，老師這么多人面下來肯定累了，可以來點小幽默 緩解下氣氛。不懂別直接說i dont know.說點總好的。