何凱文每日一句:2017考研英語第25句

 　　何凱文每日一句:2017考研英語第25句

　　對于中國學生來說，很多人在各種各樣的考試當中都被英語所難倒，很多同學在考研的時候也因英語分數低而導致考研失敗。2017考研的同學們為了避免這種情況，一定要盡早開啟2017考研英語的復習。基礎階段，同學們主要搞定詞匯、長難句和語法等基礎知識。文都考研小編每日給大家分享文都何凱文老師的句子，幫大家打好2017考研英語的基礎。以下是第25句：

　　The pursuit of private interests with as little interference as possible from government was seen as the road to human happiness and progress rather than the public obligation and involvement in the collective community that emphasized by the Greeks.

　　詞匯突破：pursuit 追求

　　Interference 干涉

　　Obligation 責任，義務

　　Involvement 關于，涉及，參與

　　rather than 而不是

　　Greeks 不是“格瑞克斯”哈，是希臘人

　　主干識別：The pursuit of private interests was seen as the road to human happiness and progress.

　　其他成分：with as little interference as possible from government 狀語

　　rather than the public obligation and involvement in the collective community that emphasized by the Greeks.狀語

　　難點解析：比較難的就是第一個狀語的語序，其實如果看句子比較多的同學你會發現這種用法基本是種習慣用法了，我來幫你調一下語序：

　　with as little interference as possible from government=

　　with interference from government as little as possible

　　這樣就懂了吧。

　　在真題中有這樣一個結構：

　　in as obvious a manner as possible

　　試著調整一下語序;

　　別問我歪果仁怎么要這樣寫，他們是逗逼唄。

　　參考譯文： 在盡可能少的ZF干預下追求個人利益被看作為通往人類幸福和進步的道路， 而不是希臘人所強調的集體社會中的公共義務與參與。

　　這里有一個同類型的句子：

　　His function is analogous to that of a judge, who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a manner as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.

　　詞匯突破：analogous 類似于

　　Obligation 義務

　　Manner 方式

　　Reason 推理

　　Reveal 揭示(在這個句子中比較好翻譯為“展示”)

　　Function 在這個語境中應該是“職責”

　　句子主干：His function is analogous to that of a judge

　　其他成分：who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a manner as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.定語從句

　　微觀分析：who=judge 或者就是前面的he,因為兩人的職責是類似的所以指代誰都是一樣的。

　　這個部分的難點在于你要識別出revealing的賓語

　　revealing the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.

　　in as obvious a manner as possible做的是狀語，看看剛才我們是怎么處理的：

　　in a manner as obvious as possible

　　用盡可能明顯的方式;

　　( ，in the manner of a hero ,用一種英雄的方式)

　　后面的which led him to his decision修飾過程，你問我為什么不修飾reasoning，你自己翻譯就知道不通順了，這是語法解決不了的二義性，從語法上講都是可以的時候就只有看語境了。

　　參考譯文：他的職責與法官相似，他必須承擔這樣的責任：用盡可能明了的方式來展示自己做出決定的推理過程。